|
Beautifully toned Fine+ with old hole near edge,
full inner details and most of legends with slight doubling that renders the
motto as VTTRA QUE.

This unusual and important coin is completely
missing in all references, including Carlos Jara’s landmark book Historia de
la Casa de Moneda de Guatemala 1731-1776 (2010). It was struck with regular
cob dies but on a fully round planchet about 24 mm in diameter with an ornate
floral edge design, like what is seen on the pillar coinage struck in Mexico
contemporaneously, and of relatively even thickness, in stark contrast to the
regular cob issues of Guatemala, but at the same time clearly much cruder than
its Mexican counterparts. A similar issue was made in Guatemala in 1733, as
detailed in Jara’s book and summarized as follows:
A Royal Ordinance dated January 17, 1731,
authorized the founding of the Guatemala mint in order to strike coins in
accordance with the Seville Ordinances of 1728, which specified a milled coinage
of the pillar type for the silver and a wigged-bust or pelucona type for
the gold. For two or three days only, starting in March 19, 1733, the mint did
indeed issue fully round coins with an edge design (albeit hand struck due to
the lack of coining presses) but this immediately proved to be economically
impractical. Therefore, on March 21, 1733, just two days after the mintage of
these coins had begun, the mint’s director José Eustaquio de León requested two
concessions: first, the striking of gold coins on round planchets of reduced
diameter (but with an edge design) in order to ensure a good (strong) impression
of the dies; and second, the mintage of silver coinage on irregularly shaped
flans, also of reduced size, and with no edge design (corresponding to
the common hand-struck silver coinage issued in Guatemala through 1753.) The
silver coins of 1733 struck on round planchets are thus neither patterns
nor special presentation pieces, but simply the first silver coins that
were struck in the Guatemala mint… for only three days!
Eustaquio de León was nevertheless a
conscientious man, and continued to produce coins that were in strict compliance
with the 1728 Seville Ordinances. Reports to the king dated 1739 by him and the
mint’s accountant Juan José Martínez and Treasurer Santiago de Villavicencio all
requested instructions from Spain to produce “moneda circular o esferica”.
In particular, Villavicencio explicitly indicated in his communication of April
13, 1739: “regarding the striking of round coinage, if it were His Majesty’s
will that the coinage produced in this mint [of Guatemala] were not the hand
struck one, as has been the case until now, but [rather] the round one, His
Majesty should order that the necessary instruments be sent from Mexico since it
would be very difficult to find in this city [of Guatemala] a craftsman that
would fabricate them with perfection...”
Villavicencio’s request was not fulfilled until
May 14, 1751, when a Royal Ordinance instructed that the coinage struck in
Guatemala should be all in round milled coins. The necessary master dies,
puncheons and edge milling instruments were received on February 17, 1753, and
the first milled coins were finally struck on March 29, 1754.
However, Eustaquio de León was diligent enough
to implement on his own (meaning without receiving machinery from Mexico or
Spain) a coin press in 1745; the proclamation medals of 1747, all struck on
carefully cut round flans with an edge design and showing a better strike than
that of the regular hand struck silver coins, are most probably a milled issue,
minted on Eustaquio de León’s coining press.
The present 1742 two reales, definitely struck
in Guatemala and on a round flan with a similar edge design, now allows us to
conclude that the first trial strikings with that coin press had started a bit
earlier, in 1742. Its reduced flan diameter of about 25 mm (the average diameter
for the milled pillar two reales in the Fonrobert, Patterson, and Castillo
collections being 26 mm), shows that Eustaquio de León clearly did not wish to
subject the newly constructed coining press to excessive stress during the early
trial strikes. This is reminiscent of his request to issue the hand-struck gold
coinage on reduced diameter flans. The imperfect condition of this new press is
also hinted at from the coin’s double or triple strike. Why this first press was
not used to make regular coinage after that is unknown.
A lack of price history makes it impossible to
determine a fair estimate for this unique coin; the closest comparison is an
example of the round 1733 half real (of which two or three are known), in much
lesser grade and crudely plugged, that sold for 2600 Euros (about $3700) in
Cayón in June 2009 (later estimated in Jara’s book for US$5000). The historical
importance of our 1742 coin from contemporary documentation, as well as its
being a previously unknown denomination for the round silver coins of Philip V,
and of a previously unpublished date (remember that all previously published
round silver coins of Philip V are dated 1733), demands a healthy premium over
the aforementioned 1733 half real.
|